PE vs PP Artificial Grass Fibers: Technical Breakdown of Tensile Strength, Wear Resistance & Best Uses

Selecting the right artificial grass fiber—Polyethylene (PE) or Polypropylene (PP)—requires understanding their core technical differences. Based on industry specifications and product data, here’s a precise comparison to guide your choice.

1. Tensile Strength & Durability

PE fibers, used in FX-Everland11 sports turf, are engineered for high tensile strength (tested up to 18000Dtex) due to their flexible molecular structure. This makes them ideal for high-impact areas like soccer fields, where PE’s shock absorption minimizes athlete injuries. In contrast, PP fibers (e.g., FX-Spring09’s curly yarns) prioritize rigidity over elasticity, resulting in lower tensile strength but better short-term cost efficiency.

2. Wear Resistance & Longevity

PE’s density (16800 stitches/m² in premium grades) ensures superior wear resistance. Its PU backing enhances durability, preventing fiber fraying even with heavy foot traffic. PP fibers, often paired with SBR latex backing, degrade faster under UV exposure and mechanical stress, making them better suited for decorative uses like low-traffic landscapes or indoor installations.

3. Application Scenarios

 PE Grass: Optimal for sports fields (e.g., FIFA-standard FX-Everland11 with 30mm pile height) and pet-friendly lawns (9000Dtex anti-snagging fibers).

 PP Grass: Ideal for budget landscapes (e.g., FX-Spring09’s 4-color blend) or temporary installations due to lower UV resistance.

4.Key Parameters 

PE Grass 

Dtex Range 9000–18000 

Stitch Density 16800/m²

Backing Type PU

Common Use Sports fields, playgrounds

PP Grass

Dtex Range 6000–10000

Stitch Density  14700/m²

Backing Type SBR latex

Common Use Gardens, poolside decor

Pro Tip: For hybrid needs, FX-Autumn10 combines PE monofilament (30mm) with PP curly fibers to balance aesthetics and resilience in residential landscapes.